Data

Download all responsibility data 


Lost Time Injuries – on-site (n./%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Employees

352

347

392

425

423△

Employee rate

0.36%

0.35%

0.39%

0.41%

0.41%△

Contractors

41

74

89

72

77△

Contractor rate

0.14%

0.32%

0.34%

0.25%

0.24%△

            


Lost time injuries – on-site by location (n.)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

LTIs onsite employees

United Kingdom

84

93

117

103

153

Europe and Africa

176

162

164

210

186

The Americas

12

11

27

40

22

Asia Pacific

80

81

84

72

62

Total

352

347

392

425

423△

LTIs onsite contractors

United Kingdom

15

20

16

11

20

Europe and Africa

18

46

64

53

52

The Americas

1

5

2

2

2

Asia Pacific

8

3

7

6

3

Total

41

74

89

72

77△

LTIs onsite Total

United Kingdom

99

113

133

114

173

Europe and Africa

194

208

228

263

238

The Americas

13

16

29

42

24

Asia Pacific

88

84

91

78

65

Total

393

421

481

497

500


Lost time injuries – on-site by segment (n./%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

Employees

183

161

192

213

221

Employee rate

0.40%

0.34%

0.37%

0.42%

0.44%

Contractors

20

36

39

32

35

Contractor rate

0.65%

1.16%

1.21%

0.93%

0.85%

Grocery

Employees

106

121

119

106

97

Employee rate

0.81%

0.93%

0.89%

0.79%

0.70%

Contractors

6

3

13

4

5

Contractor rate

0.24%

0.12%

0.43%

0.20%

0.24%

Ingredients

Employees

8

7

15

24

14

Employee rate

0.13%

0.12%

0.26%

0.39%

0.23%

Contractors

3

8

4

5

3

Contractor rate

0.15%

0.40%

0.20%

0.25%

0.16%

Sugar

Employees

44

43

57

66

78

Employee rate

0.14%

0.15%

0.21%

0.21%

0.27%

Contractors

10

24

33

30

33

Contractor rate

0.05%

0.16%

0.19%

0.14%

0.14%

Agriculture

Employees

11

15

9

16

13

Employee rate

0.39%

0.53%

0.28%

0.51%

0.42%

Contractors

2

3

0

1

1

Contractor rate

0.93%

1.39%

—%

0.16%

0.14%


Factories and retail operations with zero employee on-site LTIs (%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Group

67%

69%

67%

67%

68%


Factories and retail operations with zero employee on-site LTIs – by segment %

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

72%

73%

71%

71%

70%

Grocery

45%

45%

43%

46%

56%

Ingredients

83%

89%

80%

78%

81%

Sugar

31%

31%

10%

32%

26%

Agriculture

66%

67%

76%

65%

78%



Methodologies

Health, safety and wellbeing

Employee: A person working directly for, and paid directly by, the business. Full-time employees include all people with a contract of employment to work the hours of a standard working week. Part-time employees include all people with a contract of employment to work for fewer hours than the standard working week.

Contractor: An independent person who works for the business and is under our control but who is employed by another company or is self-employed. A contractor or seasonal worker does not work regularly or permanently for the business. They work only as and when required. Typically, a contractor or seasonal worker will have a period of work specified in their contract, and an end date will usually be specified. As the nature of contract work varies across our businesses – for example from contract cleaning, security and catering staff to seasonal agricultural staff – our businesses are responsible for applying the Group’s definition of a contractor to their workforce. With each year of monitoring contractor safety, we see improvements in how this definition is applied with greater consistency from year to year and across the businesses.

Fatal injury: We report the death of an employee, contractor or seasonal worker as a result of work activities with the business. This includes activities in our operations, under our direct control and for people who are our responsibility, be they an employee, contractor or seasonal worker. It also includes employees and contractors travelling for work purposes (for example, engineers visiting factory sites or travelling to attend a training course). Deaths that occur during an individual’s commute to or from work are not included unless the national legislation stipulates this as a work-related fatality. Deaths from natural causes, such as heart attacks and deaths from non-work activities, are not included.

Safety data: For Group safety data, we include Associated British Foods plc central employees based in our head offices as part of our total headcount.

Lost Time Injury (LTI): An injury that arises out of, or in connection with, work activities, which occurred on-site and results in the injured employee or contractor being absent from work for at least one day or one shift within 12 months of the accident. When we report the percentage of sites without an LTI during the year, we include the number of factories providing employee numbers and production figures and, in the case of Primark, the number of stores and distribution centres.

Lost Time Injury (LTI) rate: The LTI rate is the percentage of employees (full-time equivalent) or contractors having an LTI during the year.


Lost Time Injuries – on-site (n./%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Employees

183

161

192

213

221

Employee rate

0.40%

0.34%

0.37%

0.42%

0.44%

Contractors

20

36

39

32

35

Contractor rate

0.65%

1.16%

1.21%

0.93%

0.85%


Factories and retail operations with zero employee on-site LTIs (%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

72%

73%

71%

71%

70%


Lost Time Injuries – on-site (n./%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Employees

106

121

119

106

97

Employee rate

0.81%

0.93%

0.89%

0.79%

0.70%

Contractors

6

3

13

4

5

Contractor rate

0.24%

0.12%

0.43%

0.20%

0.24%


Factories and retail operations with zero employee on-site LTIs (%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

45%

45%

43%

46%

56%


Lost Time Injuries – on-site (n./%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Employees

8

7

15

24

14

Employee rate

0.13%

0.12%

0.26%

0.39%

0.23%

Contractors

3

8

4

5

3

Contractor rate

0.15%

0.40%

0.20%

0.25%

0.16%


Factories and retail operations with zero employee on-site LTIs (%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

83%

89%

80%

78%

81%


Lost Time Injuries – on-site (n./%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Employees

44

43

57

66

78

Employee rate

0.14%

0.15%

0.21%

0.21%

0.27%

Contractors

10

24

33

30

33

Contractor rate

0.05%

0.16%

0.19%

0.14%

0.14%


Factories and retail operations with zero employee on-site LTIs (%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

31%

31%

10%

32%

26%


Lost Time Injuries – on-site (n./%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Employees

11

15

9

16

13

Employee rate

0.39%

0.53%

0.28%

0.51%

0.42%

Contractors

2

3

–

1

1

Contractor rate

0.93%

1.39%

—%

0.16%

0.14%


Factories and retail operations with zero employee on-site LTIs (%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

66%

67%

76%

65%

78%

Gender metrics (n./%)

Average number of employees*

Men in workforce

Women in workforce

% of workforce who are women

Number of senior management roles**

Number of men in senior management roles

Number of women in senior management roles

% of senior management who are women

Retail

81,358

18,928

62,430

77%

410

169

241

59%

Grocery

18,885

12,831

6,054

32%

964

526

436

45%

Ingredients

7,946

5,784

2,162

27%

786

505

276

35%

Sugar

27,696

22,117

5,579

20%

311

209

102

33%

Agriculture

3,186

2,001

1,185

37%

436

249

185

42%

Central

721

426

295

41%

66

46

20

30%

Total

139,792△

62,087

77,705

56%△

2,973

1,713

1,260

42%

*Full-time, part-time employees and directly employed contractors.

**Includes directorships of subsidiary undertakings.


Location of employees

Number of employees

United Kingdom

45,258

Europe

48,790

The Americas

8,856

Asia Pacific

11,215

Africa

25,673

Total

139,792△


Gender pay gap

Gender pay gap reporting – Group businesses in GB as a whole (%)

2023

2024

2025

2026

Women's mean hourly pay rate is below that of men by

28.2%

25.6%

25.4%

23.5%

Women's median hourly pay rate is below that of men by

18.9%

15.2%

17.8%

15.2%

Women's mean bonus pay rate is below that of men by

27.0%

41.6%

33.7%

34.4%

Women's median bonus pay rate is above that of men by

21.8%

57.4%

68.8%

(74.7)%

Percentage of men who receive a bonus

26.6%

23.9%

26.6%

26.6%

Percentage of women who received a bonus

7.9%

8.5%

9.2%

10.1%


Proportion of men and women in each pay quartile – Group businesses in GB as a whole %

2023

2024

2025

2026

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Upper

64.5%

35.5%

64.5%

35.5%

63.5%

36.5%

60.7%

39.3%

Upper middle

42.9%

57.1%

41.8%

58.2%

46.4%

53.6%

44.5%

55.5%

Lower middle

23.5%

76.5%

25.5%

74.5%

25.0%

75.0%

26.0%

74.0%

Lower

22.8%

77.2%

24.6%

75.4%

23.5%

76.5%

23.9%

76.1%


Gender pay gap – Group businesses in GB without Primark (%)

2023

2024

2025

2026

Mean pay gap (women higher than men)

3.6%

4.6%

4.3%

(5.6)%

Median pay gap (women higher than men)

10.2%

7.3%

7.3%

(9.8)%

Mean bonus gap (women lower than men)

24.1%

43.3%

34.8%

36.8%

Median bonus gap (women higher than men)

29.8%

29.9%

13.7%

(29.0)%

% of men received bonus

50.8%

46.4%

49.1%

50.4%

% of women received bonus

66.5%

65.8%

62.9%

67.5%


Proportion of men and women in each pay quartile – Group businesses in GB without Primark (%)

2023

2024

2025

2026

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Upper

68.0%

32.0%

65.6%

34.4%

64.6%

35.4%

62.8%

37.2%

Upper middle

71.0%

29.0%

72.1%

27.9%

72.3%

27.7%

71.5%

28.5%

Lower middle

79.0%

21.0%

76.7%

23.3%

75.9%

24.1%

76.6%

23.4%

Lower

71.3%

28.7%

70.5%

29.5%

69.1%

30.9%

69.3%

30.7%


Methodologies

Employee: a person working directly for, and paid directly by, the business, including directly employed contractors. Full-time employees include all people with a contract of employment to work the hours of a standard working week. Part-time employees include all people with a contract of employment to work for fewer hours than the standard working week.

Women: within local legislation these are those that are defined, or define themselves, as female or women.

Men: within local legislation these are those that are defined, or define themselves, as male or men, or those that are defined, or define themselves as non-binary/other gender or the individuals prefer not to say. This also includes where there is a legislative requirement not to hold such classification of employees.

Other: within local legislation there are those that are defined, or define themselves as non-binary/other gender or the individuals prefer not to say. Also includes where there is a legislative requirement not to hold such classification of employees.

Average number of employees: the average number of employees as defined above for each pay period in the year divided by the number of pay periods in the financial year.

Average number of men and women in the workforce: the average number of men and women employed for the financial year is calculated on the same basis as the average number of employees as a whole, as set out above.

Average number of men and women in management roles: the average number of men and women in management roles employed for the financial year is calculated on the same basis as the average number of employees as a whole, as set out above. A management role is defined as a role that has one or more direct reports and where the individual has management responsibilities.

Senior management role: a role which has one or more direct reports and in which the individual has management responsibilities, as well as within a minimum reporting line of the Group or divisional chief executives.

Gender pay gap

Consistent with previous years, we have chosen to report voluntarily on the gender pay gap that relates to our employee population in Great Britain (GB) as of 5 April 2026. However, more than half of our workforce is employed outside GB and therefore not included in this gender pay analysis. Consistent with last year we have presented data for the Group businesses in GB as a whole and for the Group businesses in GB without Primark.

Gender metrics (n./%)

n.

%

Total employees*

81,358

100%

Men in workforce

18,928

23%

Women in workforce

62,430

77%

Number of senior management roles**

410

100%

Number of men in senior management roles

169

41%

Number of women in senior management roles

241

59%

*Full-time, part-time and seasonal/contractors.

**Includes directorships of subsidiary undertakings.

Gender metrics (n./%)

n.

%

Total employees*

18,885

100%

Men in workforce

12,831

68%

Women in workforce

6,054

32%

Number of senior management roles**

964

100%

Number of men in senior management roles

526

55%

Number of women in senior management roles

436

45%

*Full-time, part-time and seasonal/contractors.

**Includes directorships of subsidiary undertakings.

Gender metrics (n./%)

n.

%

Total employees*

7,946

100%

Men in workforce

5,784

73%

Women in workforce

2,162

27%

Number of senior management roles**

786

100%

Number of men in senior management roles

505

64%

Number of women in senior management roles

276

35%

*Full-time, part-time and seasonal/contractors.

**Includes directorships of subsidiary undertakings.

Gender metrics (n./%)

n.

%

Total employees*

27,696

100%

Men in workforce

22,117

80%

Women in workforce

5,579

20%

Number of senior management roles**

311

100%

Number of men in senior management roles

209

67%

Number of women in senior management roles

102

33%

*Full-time, part-time and seasonal/contractors.

**Includes directorships of subsidiary undertakings.

Gender metrics (n./%)

n.

%

Total employees*

3,186

100%

Men in workforce

2,001

63%

Women in workforce

1,185

37%

Number of senior management roles**

436

100%

Number of men in senior management roles

249

57%

Number of women in senior management roles

185

42%

*Full-time, part-time and seasonal/contractors.

**Includes directorships of subsidiary undertakings.

GHG emissions – Scopes 1 and 2 (market-based) (000 tonnes CO2e)
      
 

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

ABF

2,785

2,587

2,627

2,410

2,079△


GHG emissions – Scopes 1 and 2 (market-based) (000 tonnes CO2e)
      
 

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

132

97

77

47

46

Grocery

423

404

385

349

367

Ingredients

358

258

210

221

219

Sugar

1,801

1,746

1,888

1,724

1,385

Agriculture

71

83

68

71

62


GHG emissions – by Scope (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Scope 1: Combustion of fuel and operation of machinery

2,072

1,896

1,989

1,828

1,578

Scope 1: Generation and use of renewables

72

76

72

63

56

Total Scope 1

2,144

1,973

2,061

1,891

1,634△

Scope 2: Location-based

635

628

612

591

501△

Scope 2: Market-based

641

614

567

519

445△

Biogenic emissions

3,815

4,186

4,045

3,438

3,753△


GHG emissions – by segment (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

Scope 1

21

21

23

18

18

Scope 2 (market-based)

111

76

54

28

28

Scope 3

6,452

7,019

6,211

5,993

4,720

Biogenic emissions

–

–

–

–

–

Grocery

Scope 1

231

203

195

157

157

Scope 2 (market-based)

192

201

190

192

210

Biogenic emissions

8

24

14

13

12

Ingredients

Scope 1

173

151

135

142

151

Scope 2 (market-based)

185

107

74

79

67

Biogenic emissions

270

253

239

247

280

Sugar

Scope 1

1,682

1,549

1,669

1,538

1,277

Scope 2 (market-based)

119

197

219

186

109

Biogenic emissions

3,537

3,908

3,793

3,179

3,460

Agriculture

Scope 1

37

49

38

36

31

Scope 2 (market-based)

34

34

30

34

31

Biogenic emissions

–

–

–

–

2


GHG emissions intensity against revenue – Scopes 1 and 2 (location-based) (000 tonnes CO2e per £m)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

CO2e/Revenue

196

163

132

133

112



Methodologies

Reporting our GHG emissions

We follow the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard using a financial control approach. We report our GHG emissions in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCO2e).

We have developed detailed reporting guidance including estimation and calculation methodologies and assumptions based on the GHG Protocol. This reporting guidance is issued to the businesses each year. Emissions have been calculated using carbon conversion factors published by the UK Government in June 2025, other internationally recognised sources and bespoke factors based on laboratory calculations at selected locations.

Under the GHG Protocol, GHG emissions are categorized into three scopes, as outlined below. For transparency and to provide a holistic view of our carbon footprint, we also report our biogenic carbon dioxide emissions, which originate from biological sources as plant-based materials and are part of the natural carbon-cycle. Within our operations, biogenic carbon emissions are primarily from the combustion or fermentation of biomass / biofuels on our sites.

Scope 1 emissions are direct emissions from our own operations and include those from:

  • the use of non-renewable fuels such as natural gas and coal in boilers and dryers, as well as fugitive emissions;
  • our manufacturing processes such as the fermentation process to make bioethanol, bread baking, the management of on-site wastewater and from electrical equipment;
  • directly controlled agricultural activities including growing sugar beet and sugarcane, other crop production and CO2 emitted from horticulture; and
  • owned transport.

Scope 2 emissions are from purchased electricity, heat or steam used on our sites. Scope 2 emissions are reported on both a location and market-based approach in line with the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance. Scope 2 location-based emissions reflect the average emissions intensity of grids from which our energy consumption occurs. Scope 2 market-based emissions are calculated using the emissions from the electricity that our businesses have purchased. Purchased renewable electricity, which is supported by appropriate evidence from the energy provider (i.e. renewable energy certificates, Guarantees of Origin or similar), and that meets the ‘quality criteria’ outlined in the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, is converted to CO2e by applying supplier-specific emission factors. Where supplier-provided emission factors are not available, we have applied the specific residual mix factor. Where the residual mix factor is not available, we revert to the location-based grid average emission factor.

We have reported Scope 2 GHG emissions on a market-based basis since 2021. Unless otherwise stated, Scope 2 GHG emissions are therefore market-based. For reporting against targets with baselines set before 2021, those baselines are location-based, which are generally more conservative as they reflect average grid emission factors. Comparisons therefore reflect location-based baseline data versus market-based current data.

Primark’s Scope 3 GHG emissions

Primark completed a Scope 3 inventory for 2025/26, which was assured by EY. Only the following categories are included in Primark’s Scope 3 emissions data as per the screening process. Unless otherwise stated, the UK Government’s GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting (DEFRA) 2026 factors were applied.

Category 1 – Purchased goods and services. Emissions factors derived from supplier primary data (captured from the Higg FEM and Trustrace) were used alongside DEFRA 2012, DEFRA 2014, DEFRA 2026, Sphera MLC DB 2023.2, NAICS-6 SupplyChainGHGEF and were supplemented by custom emission factors based on averages for the type of activity (derived from The Higg Materials Sustainability Index versions 3.10 and 3.12).

Category 2 – Capital goods (NAICS-6 SupplyChainGHGEF).

Category 3 – Fuel and energy-related activities (DEFRA 2020, DEFRA 2026, Sphera MLC DB 2023.2 and Sphera Solutions GmbH 2019).

Category 4 – Upstream transportation and distribution. Emissions from Primark’s upstream transportation and distribution activities include the well-to-tank lifecycle emissions (DEFRA 2023, DEFRA 2026 and Clean Cargo 2025).

Category 5 – Waste generated in operations (DEFRA 2026 and Sphera MLC DB 2023.2).

Category 6 – Business travel (DEFRA 2026).

Category 7 – Employee commuting (DEFRA 2026).

Category 9 – Downstream transportation and distribution Emissions from Primark’s upstream transportation and distribution activities include the well-to-tank lifecycle emissions (DEFRA 2026 and Clean Cargo 2025).

Category 11 – Use of sold products (ECOSI 2018).

Category 12 – End-of-life treatment of sold products (DEFRA 2020, DEFRA 2026 and WRAP 2012).

Category 13 – Downstream leased assets (DEFRA 2026 and UK Government Non-domestic need data framework 2022).

Category 14 – Franchises (DEFRA 2026 and IEA 2026).

GHG emissions – Scopes 1 and 2 (market-based) (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

132

97

77

47

46


GHG emissions – by Scope (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Scope 1: Combustion of fuel and operation of machinery

21

21

23

18

18

Scope 1: Generation and use of renewables

–

–

–

–

–

Total Scope 1

21

21

23

18

18

Scope 2: Location-based

103

99

85

87

84

Scope 2: Market-based

111

76

54

28

28

Biogenic emissions

–

–

–

–

–


GHG emissions – Scope 3 by category (000's tonnes CO2e)

2025

2026

Category 1 – Purchased goods and services

4,880

3,673

Category 2 – Capital goods

101

74

Category 3 – Fuel and energy‑related activities

21

21

Category 4 – Upstream transportation and distribution

310

269

Category 5 – Waste generated in operations

7

5

Category 6 – Business travel

5

3

Category 7 – Employee commuting

5

5

Category 9 – Downstream transportation and distribution

–

5

Category 10 – Processing of sold products

–

–

Category 11 – Use of sold products

607

608

Category 12 – End-of-life treatment of sold products

36

37

Category 13 – Downstream leased assets

18

16

Category 14 - Franchises

5

Total Scope 3

5,993

4,720△


GHG emissions – Scopes 1 and 2 (market-based ) (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

423

404

385

349

367


GHG emissions – by Scope (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Scope 1: Combustion of fuel and operation of machinery

231

203

195

157

157

Scope 1: Generation and use of renewables

–

–

–

–

–

Total Scope 1

231

203

195

157

157

Scope 2: Location-based

181

176

174

169

155

Scope 2: Market-based

192

201

190

192

210

Biogenic emissions

8

24

14

13

12

GHG emissions – Scopes 1 and 2 (market-based) (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

358

258

210

221

219


GHG emissions – by Scope (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Scope 1: Combustion of fuel and operation of machinery

173

151

135

142

151

Scope 1: Generation and use of renewables

–

–

–

–

–

Total Scope 1

173

151

135

142

151

Scope 2: Location-based

209

141

122

136

132

Scope 2: Market-based

185

107

74

79

67

Biogenic emissions

270

253

239

247

280

GHG emissions – Scopes 1 and 2 (market-based) (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

1,801

1,746

1,888

1,724

1,385


GHG emissions – by Scope (000's tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Scope 1: Combustion of fuel and operation of machinery

1,610

1,473

1,597

1,475

1,221

Scope 1: Generation and use of renewables

72

76

72

63

56

Total Scope 1

1,682

1,549

1,669

1,538

1,277

Scope 2: Location-based

113

189

208

177

111

Scope 2: Market-based

119

197

219

186

109

Biogenic emissions

3,537

3,908

3,793

3,179

3,460

GHG emissions – Scopes 1 and 2 (market-based) by segment (000 tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

71

83

68

71

62


GHG emissions – by Scope (000's tonnes CO2e)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Scope 1: Combustion of fuel and operation of machinery

1,610

1,473

1,597

1,475

1,221

Scope 1: Generation and use of renewables

72

76

72

63

56

Total Scope 1

1,682

1,549

1,669

1,538

1,277

Scope 2: Location-based

113

189

208

177

111

Scope 2: Market-based

119

197

219

186

109

Biogenic emissions

3,537

3,908

3,793

3,179

3,460

Energy use (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

ABF

20,140

20,548

20,697

18,459

18,472△


Renewable energy (GWh/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

ABF

11,296

12,223

11,712

9,955

11,100

Percentage of total energy

56%

59%

57%

54%

60%△


Total energy use by segment (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

541

524

492

488

486

Grocery

1,310

1,266

1,235

1,109

1,116

Ingredients

1,492

1,336

1,238

1,327

1,404

Sugar

16,577

17,213

17,534

15,340

15,298

Agriculture

222

209

198

194

169


Energy use by source (GWh/%)

2026

% of total

Electricity – non-renewable source

906

5%

Imported steam

130

1%

Natural Gas

5,403

29%

Liquid Fuels

204

1%

Solid fuels

728

4%

Renewables

11,100

60%△


Total energy exported by segment (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

–

–

–

–

–

Grocery

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.9

Ingredients

16

17

2

1

11

Sugar

862

850

850

757

804

Agriculture

50

42

35

37

37

ABF Group

929

909

887

795

852△



Methodologies

Energy used: Energy data is reported in line with our greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting scope. The total energy used includes energy from electricity, natural gas, gas oil, coal, diesel, coke, anthracite, petrol, kerosene, heavy fuel oil, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), imported steam and renewable sources. The total is displayed as gigawatt hours (GWh) with a split between energy consumed from non-renewable and renewable sources. Energy consumption is calculated using country-specific conversion factors from physical quantities to kWh to provide an accurate representation of our energy consumption.

Energy used from renewable sources: This includes energy that is generated on-site from renewable fuels which includes bagasse and its residue, biogas and wood; energy generated from non-fuel renewable sources on-site including solar and purchased electricity and steam supported by evidence of renewable source. The total is displayed as gigawatt hours (GWh). From 2022, we include purchased electricity and steam from a renewable source in the total figure. The emissions from our on-site generated energy from renewable sources are captured in our Scope 1 GHG emissions.

Energy exported: The total energy exported includes electricity and biogas generated on our sites and is usually sold to the national distribution network or grid, sold to tenants or sold directly to another organisation.

Exported electricity is generated in the main from bagasse, the renewable plant-based fibrous residue that remains after the extraction of juice from the crushed stalks of sugarcane. Biogas is generated from on-site wastewater treatment or anaerobic digestion of waste.

Total energy use (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

541

524

492

488

486


Renewable energy (GWh/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

103

301

246

280

294

Percentage of total energy

19%

58%

50%

57%

61%


Energy use by source (GWh/%)

2026

% of total

Electricity – non-renewable source

77

16%

Imported steam

22

5%

Natural Gas

88

18%

Liquid Fuels

5

1%

Solid fuels

–

–%

Renewables

294

60%


Total energy exported (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

–

–

–

–

–

Total energy use (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

1,310

1,266

1,235

1,109

1,116


Renewable energy (GWh/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

85

51

67

56

70

Percentage of total energy

6%

4%

5%

5%

6%


Energy use by source (GWh/%)

2026

% of total

Electricity – non-renewable source

345

31%

Imported steam

4

–%

Natural Gas

631

57%

Liquid Fuels

65

6%

Solid fuels

–

–%

Renewables

70

6%


Total energy exported (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

–

–

–

–

1

Total energy use (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

1,492

1,336

1,238

1,327

1,404


Renewable energy (GWh/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

286

309

272

355

389

Percentage of total energy

19%

23%

22%

27%

28%


Energy use by source (GWh/%)

2026

% of total

Electricity – non-renewable source

152

11%

Imported steam

75

5%

Natural Gas

715

51%

Liquid Fuels

73

5%

Solid fuels

–

–%

Renewables

389

28%


Total energy exported (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

16

17

2

1

11

Total energy use (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

16,577

17,213

17,534

15,340

15,298


Renewable energy (GWh/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

10,796

11,549

11,108

9,252

10,337

Percentage of total

65%

67%

63%

60%

68%


Energy use by source (GWh/%)

2026

% of total

Electricity – non-renewable source

272

2%

Imported steam

14

–%

Natural Gas

3,898

25%

Liquid Fuels

49

–%

Solid fuels

728

5%

Renewables

10,337

68%


Total energy exported (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

862

850

850

757

804

Total energy use (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

222

209

198

194

169


Renewable energy (GWh/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

26

12

18

11

10

Percentage of total energy

12%

6%

9%

6%

6%


Energy use by source (GWh/%)

2026

% of total

Electricity – non-renewable source

60

36%

Imported steam

15

9%

Natural Gas

71

42%

Liquid Fuels

13

8%

Solid fuels

–

–%

Renewables

10

6%


Total energy exported (GWh)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

50

42

35

37

37

Total waste generated (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

ABF

458

374

499

510

359△


Waste generated by segment (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

77

85

86

91

95

Grocery

83

85

94

91

97

Ingredients

101

69

31

41

43

Sugar

192

129

282

279

116

Agriculture

6

6

6

8

8


Waste recycled – Group total (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

ABF

425

343

470

477

324

Percentage of total

93%

92%

94%

94%

90%△


Waste recycled by segment (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

73

81

82

84

91

Grocery

70

70

81

78

83

Ingredients

92

61

23

33

34

Sugar

185

126

279

274

109

Agriculture

5

5

5

7

7


Waste sent to landfill (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

ABF

33

31

30

33

35

Percentage of total

7%

8%

6%

6%

10%


Waste sent to landfill by segment (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

3

3

4

6

4

Grocery

13

15

13

13

14

Ingredients

9

9

8

8

9

Sugar

6

3

3

5

7

Agriculture

1

1

1

1

1



Methodologies

Recycled, recovered or reused waste: A substance or material that has no further use in our relevant operation and so is sent off-site for use, for recycling or for recovery. These processes extract maximum value from the material. Where we state a material has been recycled in our reporting, this means it has been either recycled, recovered, reused or sent for another beneficial use. Recovery could include the material being cleaned, repaired or refurbished so that it can be used by others. Recycling could include the material being turned into a new substance or product.

Waste: A substance or material that has no further use in our main processes and requires management to discard or treat prior to final disposal. We report hazardous and non-hazardous waste material, which is sent to landfill or for treatment prior to final disposal. Where waste data is unavailable (for example, at sites where our businesses are not directly responsible for waste disposal) data are estimated based on similar locations and knowledge of operations during the year. For example, the waste generated by our Retail operations is often managed by third parties such as shopping centre waste management companies. Waste materials may not always be accurately quantified and assigned to specific businesses in the shopping centre. In these cases, our Retail division estimates the data based on a methodology, reviewed during the independent assurance process, and works with waste contractors to have oversight of the waste treatment across its supply chain.

Total waste generated (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

77

85

86

91

95


Waste recycled (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

73

81

82

84

91

Percentage of total

95%

96%

95%

93%

95%


Waste sent to landfill (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

3

3

4

6

4

Percentage of total

5%

4%

5%

7%

5%

Waste generated (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

83

85

94

91

97


Waste recycled (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

70

70

81

78

83

Percentage of total

84%

82%

86%

86%

85%


Waste sent to landfill (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

13

15

13

13

14

Percentage of total

16%

18%

14%

14%

15%

Total waste generated (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

101

69

31

41

43


Waste recycled (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

92

61

23

33

34

Percentage of total

91%

88%

75%

80%

79%


Waste sent to landfill (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

9

9

8

8

9

Percentage of total

9%

12%

25%

20%

21%

Total waste generated (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

192

129

282

279

116


Waste recycled (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

185

126

279

274

109

Percentage of total

97%

98%

99%

98%

94%


Waste sent to landfill (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

6

3

3

5

7

Percentage of total

3%

2%

1%

2%

6%

Total waste generated (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

6

6

6

8

8


Waste recycled (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

5

5

5

7

7

Percentage of total

80%

84%

87%

92%

91%


Waste sent to landfill (000 tonnes/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

1

1

1

1

1

Percentage of total

20%

16%

13%

8%

9%

Total water abstracted (million m³)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

ABF

791

859

880

808

762△


Water abstracted by segment (million m³)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

0

0

1

1

1

Grocery

5

4

5

5

5

Ingredients

19

17

16

15

16

Sugar

767

837

859

787

741

Agriculture

0

0

0

0

0


Water reused (million m³/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

ABF

204

215

215

200

186△

Percentage of total

26%

25%

24%

25%

24%


Water abstracted by source (million m³/%)

2026

% of total

Surface

736

97%

Groundwater

16

2%

Municipal and other

10

1%



Methodologies

Water abstracted: We measure in cubic metres (m3) the total quantity of water abstracted, which has either been supplied by third parties or abstracted from local water sources. This includes the total quantity of water used for agricultural or horticultural purposes on our owned land, used in our factories or stores and distributed to employees, tenants and worker accommodation, and once-through cooling water used as a heat conductor to cool equipment in our factories. The same amount of water abstracted for cooling water is returned to the watercourse. We exclude rainwater and separately measure recycled or reused treated wastewater used on our land or in our sites.

Wastewater: We measure in cubic metres (m3) the total amount of wastewater leaving our sites for final disposal via the sewerage system or a receiving watercourse. This includes wastewater from factories, offices, warehouses, worker accommodation and other sites where we have responsibility. Where meter readings from discharge points or supplier invoices are not available for wastewater quantities, estimations are provided based on the volume of water taken into the site and used in the operational processes, including the abstraction of water from certain raw materials such as sugar beet.

Recycled or reused water: We measure water reused for a beneficial purpose and therefore is initially diverted from a receiving watercourse. Where possible, our sites reuse water within their operations or off-site before it returns to the watercourse. Examples of water reuse include dust control, crop irrigation and land-spreading, cleaning on-site machinery and horticultural purposes.

Total water abstracted (million m³)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

–

–

1

1

1


Water reused (million m³/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

–

–

–

–

–

Percentage of total

–%

–%

–%

–%

–%


Water abstracted by source (million m³/%)

2026

% of total

Surface

–

–%

Groundwater

–

–%

Municipal and other

1

100%

Total water abstracted (million m³)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

5

4

5

5

5


Water reused (million m³/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

–

–

–

–

–

Percentage of total

4%

4%

4%

5%

3%


Water abstracted by source (million m³/%)

2026

% of total

Surface

1

20%

Groundwater

0

–%

Municipal and other

4

80%

Total water abstracted (million m³)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

19

17

16

15

16


Water reused (million m³/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

1

–

–

–

–

Percentage of total

3%

2%

3%

2%

3%


Water abstracted by source (million m³/%)

2026

% of total

Surface

1

6%

Groundwater

11

69%

Municipal and other

4

25%

Total water abstracted (million m³)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

767

837

859

787

741


Water reused (million m³/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

203

214

215

200

185

Percentage of total

27%

26%

25%

25%

25%


Water abstracted by source (million m³/%)

2026

% of total

Surface

734

99%

Groundwater

5

1%

Municipal and other

2

–%

Total water abstracted (million m³)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2


Water reused (million m³/%)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

–

–

–

–

–

Percentage of total

–%

–%

1%

1%

1%


Water abstracted by source (million m³/%)

2026

% of total

Surface

–

–%

Groundwater

–

–%

Municipal and other

0

–%

Packaging used (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

ABF

264

246

241

250

241△


Packaging used by segment (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

54

57

55

50

47

Grocery

158

142

142

149

148

Ingredients

27

27

27

28

29

Sugar

21

14

11

15

12

Agriculture

4

5

6

7

5



Methodologies

Packaging: Material used for the containment, protection, handling, delivery and presentation of our products. We collect packaging data for different types of materials including glass, paper, plastic and aluminium. Included in our packaging weights are items such as labels, plastic wrap, cardboard boxes, plastic containers and lids for bottles. Waste packaging, packaging on materials purchased by sites and packaging used for internal transfers are excluded.

Tonnes of product: includes all products which are deliberately created to satisfy a known market need. Included are co-products and by-products which are materials or substances arising from a production process in addition to the main product streams.
Co- and by-products may not always be sold depending on the local market needs. This KPI includes the weight of products, co- and by-products sent to co-packers for packing as well as materials which are sold, not sold or with no financial transaction and are donated. The weight of packaging is not included. Tonnes of product is used as a denominator in intensity measures, for example tonne of CO2e per tonne of product or amount of abstracted water per tonne of product.

Packaging used by segment (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Retail

54

57

55

50

47

Packaging used by segment (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Grocery

158

142

142

149

148

Packaging used by segment (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Ingredients

27

27

27

28

29

Packaging used by segment (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Sugar

21

14

11

15

12

Packaging used by segment (000 tonnes)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Agriculture

4

5

6

7

5

Scope of reporting

The Group data in the report on our environmental and safety KPIs (including calculation of ratios and rates) covered the period 1 August to 31 July. This excludes Primark selling space, numbers of countries of operation and employee numbers.

Associated British Foods plc has five business segments: Retail, Grocery, Ingredients, Sugar and Agriculture. Across these segments, we have a total of 754 production sites, warehouses, distribution centres, offices or retail stores which have collated their relevant environment and safety data for this reporting period. Primark’s stores, offices and distribution centres account for 510 reporting sites. Where relevant, the data also includes Primark sites which closed during the reporting year along with some new locations that are preparing to open.

Any business acquired part-way through a reporting year is not required to provide its annual safety or environment data to Associated British Foods in that year. Inclusion in subsequent years reporting is assessed on a case-by-case basis, dependent on their material contribution to Group performance and establishment of accurate measurement processes and systems.

For the current and prior reporting years, safety and environment data is from companies over which the Group has financial control. Control is determined with reference to the financial control tests. Control exists where the Group has the power to unilaterally, directly or indirectly, direct the activities of an entity as to affect significantly the returns of the entity. This represents a change over previous years reporting and the comparative numbers have been restated accordingly.

Across the Group, we use a number of key performance indicators to measure our safety and environmental performance. To ensure these are applied consistently, we apply standard definitions. These definitions are included in our detailed reporting guidance distributed to all businesses, including the methodologies we use for our greenhouse gas (‘GHG’) emissions reporting.

Due to rounding, business segment numbers presented throughout our Responsibility disclosures may not add to precisely the Group totals reported. Our reported KPIs on employee and gender metrics are average numbers of men and women employed for the financial year.

The basis of reporting information for the Primark metrics listed below can be found on the Primark website:

•Percentage of Primark’s cotton clothes containing Primark preferred cotton sources (organic cotton, recycled cotton, cotton from Cotton made in Africa (CmiA) or cotton from the Primark Cotton Project).

•Percentage of Primark’s clothing unit sales containing recycled or more sustainably sourced materials (organic cotton, recycled cotton, cotton from Cotton made in Africa (CmiA), cotton from the Primark Cotton Project, recycled acrylic, recycled polyamide (nylon), recycled polyester and viscose, modal and lyocell that satisfy the minimum content criteria outlined in Primark’s Fibres Glossary within the main body of the clothing unit1)

•Proportion of all clothing unit sales that are circular by design (%)

•Percentage of waste diverted from landfill

•Primark Ethical Trade Audits

1.https://corporate.primark.com/en-gb/a/news/sustainability-and-ethics-news/understanding-the-fibres-in-your-clothes

Assurance

Ernst & Young (EY) has provided independent limited assurance over 25 environment, people and safety key performance indicators (KPIs). These KPIs are highlighted in this update with the symbol △. The data in this report on our environmental and safety KPIs covered the period 1 August to 31 July, excluding employee numbers. EY conducted its engagement in accordance with the International Federation of Accountants’ International Standard on Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information – known as ISAE 3000 (Revised).


How we assess our safety and environmental performance

Safety and environment data is entered by each site into a Group-managed data system. All data is reviewed at the individual business level, by a senior environmental, safety, operational or financial representative, or a cross-functional team representing these roles, with a finance representative approving final data.

The Finance Transformation Team, part of the Group Finance function, oversees and coordinates the collection of non-financial data used for Group reporting. The team works closely with the Health and safety and Environment teams to support timely and accurate reporting and coordinates finance teams across the Group’s businesses to maintain robust and consistent data collection aligned with assurance requirements.

Throughout the year, we collaborate with all our businesses to help them with continuous improvement in data accuracy and to meet recognised reporting standards. This work includes regular training, distribution of materials and consultation if changes are made to data requirements or the reporting system.

All the data we report is based on the best possible systems and methodologies currently available to us and, where applicable, aligned with internationally or nationally recognised standards. Where possible, we use accurate data from sources such as invoices, meter readings and weight measurements. These are also subject to continuous improvement.

We report our Group-level and business segment data for the past five years to provide a good overview of our short- to medium-term performance and identify segment-level contribution to Group data.

Assurance statement

Independent Limited Assurance Report to the Directors of Associated British Foods plc

Ernst & Young LLP (‘EY’) was engaged by Associated British Foods plc (‘the Company’) to perform a limited assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised) to report on the Company’s selected non-financial indicators as listed below in Table 1 (the ‘Subject Matter’) for the year ended 31 July 2026 (or the 52 weeks ended 13 September 2026 for metrics marked with an asterisk) presented on the Associated British Foods plc 2026 Annual Report and in the 2026 Data subsection of the Responsibility section of the Company’s website (together the ‘Reports’). In preparing the Subject Matter, the Company applied the ‘Methodologies’ and ‘Scope of reporting’ as set out in the 2026 Data subsection of the Responsibility section of the Company’s website (the ‘Criteria’).

The Subject Matter is marked up with a △ symbol within the Reports. Other than as described in the preceding paragraph we did not perform assurance procedures on any other information included in the Reports, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or conclusion on any information, other than the sustainability metrics marked with a △ symbol.


Table 1. List of selected non-financial indicators

Topic

Indicator name

Associated British Foods plc – Group

Health and Safety (H&S)

Number of work-related fatalities to employees

Number of work-related fatalities to independent contractors as a result of Associated British Foods’ work activities

Number of Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) to employees on-site

Number of LTIs to contractors on-site

LTIs rate (%) to employees on-site

LTIs rate (%) to contractors on-site

Environment

  • Total energy consumed (GWh)
  • Percentage of renewable energy (%)
  • Total energy exported (GWh)
  • Biogenic carbon emissions (tCO2e)
  • Greenhouse gas emissions (tCO2e) consisting of
  • Scope 1
  • Scope 2 location-based
  • Scope 2 market-based
  • Total Scope 1 and Scope 2 (market-based) greenhouse gas emissions (tCO2e)
  • Total waste generated (tonnes)
  • Percentage of waste generated sent for recycling or other beneficial use (%)
  • Quantity of packaging used for the containment, protection, handling, delivery and presentation of goods (tonnes)
  • Total water abstracted (m3)
  • Water reused or recycled (m3)

People

  • Number of employees*
  • Percentage of women in workforce (%)*

Business segment specific – Primark

Environment

  • Greenhouse gas emissions (Scopes 1, 2 market-based and 3) (tCO2e)
  • Percentage of our clothing unit sales containing recycled or more sustainably sourced materials (%)
  • Selling space (sq. ft)*
  • Number of countries of operation*

Conclusion

Based on the procedures performed and evidence obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the Subject Matter is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the Criteria

Basis for our conclusion

We conducted our engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information, as promulgated by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and the terms of our engagement letter dated 8 June 2026, and subsequently amended on 28 October 2026, as agreed with the Company. 

In performing this engagement, we have applied International Standard on Quality Management (‘ISQM’) 1 Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or Reviews of Financial Statements, or Other Assurance or Related Services engagements, which requires that we design, implement and operate a system of quality management including policies or procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.  We have maintained our independence and other ethical requirements of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales (‘ICAEW’) Code of Ethics (which includes the requirements of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (‘IESBA’)). We are the independent auditor of the Company and therefore we will also comply with the independence requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities.

Responsibilities of the Company

The Subject Matter needs to be read and understood together with the Criteria. The directors of the Company are solely responsible for:

•the selection of the Subject Matter to be assured;

•selecting suitable Criteria against which the Subject Matter is to be evaluated and ensuring the Criteria is relevant and appropriate;

•preparing and presenting the Subject Matter in accordance with the Criteria; and

•designing and implementing internal controls and other processes they determine is necessary, to enable the Subject Matter to be free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Responsibilities of Ernst & Young LLP

It is our responsibility to:

•plan and perform the engagement to obtain limited assurance in respect of whether the Subject Matter has not been prepared in all material respects in accordance with the Criteria;

•form an independent conclusion on the basis of the work performed and evidence obtained; and

•report our conclusion to the directors of the Company.

Our approach

We conducted our engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information and ISAE 3410, Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements, as promulgated by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 

Those standards require that we plan and perform our engagement to express a conclusion on whether we are aware of any material modifications that need to be made to the Subject Matter in order for it to be in accordance with the Criteria, and to issue a report.

The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for, a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a reasonable assurance engagement been performed. Our procedures were designed to obtain a limited level of assurance on which to base our conclusion and do not provide all the evidence that would be required to provide a reasonable level of assurance.

Although we considered the effectiveness of management’s internal controls when determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our assurance engagement was not designed to provide assurance on internal controls. Our procedures did not include testing controls or performing procedures relating to checking aggregation or calculation of data within IT systems.

A limited assurance engagement consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for preparing the Subject Matter and related information and applying analytical and other appropriate procedures.

Because a limited assurance engagement can cover a range of assurance, the detail of the procedures we have performed is included below, so that our conclusion can be understood in the context of the nature, timing and extent of procedures we performed:

•Engaged with selected members of the Company’s leadership and senior management to discuss the governance structures around the preparation of the Subject Matter.

•Made enquiries and performing walkthroughs with key data owners within each division, and the central team, to understand the processes to capture, collate, aggregate, validate and source the data required to generate the Subject Matter as it relates to the Company’s consolidated figures.

•Performed analytical procedures over the quantitative elements of the Subject Matter, including consideration of trends, to identify potential anomalies within the Subject Matter and obtain management explanations for any significant differences identified.

•Analysed each division’s contribution to the Company’s consolidated figures to identify material risk areas and designed analytical or substantive procedures responsive to these risks, consistent with the established Criteria.

•Where deemed necessary tested, on a sample basis, underlying source information to check the accuracy of the Subject Matter

•Recalculated the group-level computations to assess the accuracy of data aggregation and consolidation for reporting purpose.

•Read the other information in the Associated British Foods plc 2026 Annual Report to identify any material inconsistencies between the other information and the Subject Matter.

We also performed such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.

Inherent limitations

Non-financial information is subject to more inherent limitations than financial information, given the characteristics of the underlying subject matter. Because there is not yet a large body of established practice upon which to base measurement and evaluation techniques, the methods used for measuring or evaluating non-financial information, including the precision of different techniques, can differ, yet be equally acceptable. This may affect the comparability between entities, and over time.

Our conclusion is based on historical information and the projection of any information or conclusions in the attached report to any future periods would be inappropriate.

The GHG (Greenhouse Gas emissions) quantification process is subject to scientific uncertainty, which arises because of incomplete scientific knowledge about the measurement of GHGs. Additionally, GHG procedures are subject to estimation (or measurement) uncertainty resulting from the measurement and calculation processes used to quantify emissions within the bounds of existing scientific knowledge.

Use of our report

This report is produced in accordance with the terms of our engagement letter dated 8June 2026, and subsequently amended on 28 October 2026, solely for the purpose of reporting to the directors of the Company in connection with the Subject Matter for the period ended 31 July 2026 (or for the 52 weeks ended 13 September 2026 for metrics marked with an asterisk in Table 1).

Those terms permit disclosure on the Company’s website, solely for the purpose of the Company showing that it has obtained an independent assurance report in connection with the Subject Matter.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company's directors as a body, for our work, for this report, or for the conclusions we have formed. This engagement is separate to, and distinct from, our appointment as the auditor to the Company.

Ernst & Young LLP

Reading

3 November 2026


Our use of cookies

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We’d also like to set optional analytics cookies to help us improve it. We won’t set optional cookies unless you enable them. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookie policy


Please adjust your preferences using the options below and save your preferences. Further information in respect of the specific cookies we use is available in our Cookie policy

Strictly necessary cookies

These cookies are required for the website to run. These cookies are always enabled because our website won’t work properly without them. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website, or use a shopping cart. You can set your browser to block or turn these cookies off, but all or part of our website may become inaccessible or not function correctly.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily. These cookies may allocate a unique identifier to you so we can distinguish you from other website users whilst you are browsing our website, please see our Privacy Policy for further information.

: